论文部分内容阅读
本文选译自旅美学者牟博教授为其发起并主持的“戴维森哲学与中国哲学的建设性互动”专题研究项目撰写的主旨导言。作者从一个独特的角度,即着重通过对比较哲学研究所经常被责难的所谓“四宗罪”的深入辨析和重新评判,而对比较哲学研究的一般方法论问题提出了卓有见地的观点和设想,对于当今中国哲学和比较哲学研究具有很强的针对性和重要的指导借鉴意义。
This essay is a translation of the keynote speech from a project written by a project called “Constructive Interaction between Davidson Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy” sponsored and chaired by Professor Mu Bo, a travel scholar in the United States. From a unique point of view, he puts forward his insightful ideas and assumptions on the general methodology of comparative philosophical research through an in-depth analysis and re-evaluation of the so-called “four sins” often blamed by comparative philosophical research institutes , Which has strong pertinence and important guidance for the study of Chinese philosophy and comparative philosophy today.