论文部分内容阅读
当前,有关我国军事法名称的研究工作,还有待深入。这方面的主要问题首先是有些军事法在定名时,往往只考虑内容,而对其在军事法体系中的地位以及与其它军事法名称的关系,则缺乏通盘考虑。我国现行军事法的名称有:法、条例、条令、概则、规定、规则、办法、训练大纲、细则、标准等十几个,加上历史上曾经使用过的命令、训令、布告、方法、意见等名称,共计三十余种。如此繁多庞杂的名称,往往使人难以从名称上分辨它们的调整内容、效力等级,甚至难以从名称上辨认出它们究竟是否属于军事法的范畴。其次是不同层次的立法机关制定的军事法使用相同的名称,容易使人模糊它们之间在效力
At present, the study on the name of our military law still needs further study. The main issue in this respect is above all the fact that some military law often only considers the content when naming it and lacks a general consideration of its position in the military law system and its relationship with the names of other military laws. The names of the current military laws in our country include more than a dozen of laws, regulations, decrees, general rules, regulations, rules, methods, training programs, rules and standards, as well as orders, decrees, proclamations and methods that have been used in history, Opinions and other names, a total of more than thirty kinds. Such a large number of complicated names often makes it difficult to distinguish their contents by adjusting their names and their levels of effectiveness. It is even difficult to identify from the name whether they belong to the category of military law or not. Second, the military laws enacted by legislative bodies at different levels use the same name, making it easy to make people vague between them