朱熹于书法创作及书学理论均颇有建树,其最具特色者即坚持“载道”的书学观。就书法批评与接受而言,他认为,观前代贤哲真迹应师其馨德;摹刻大儒君子之遗墨可广其仁人之言;刚正君子之书颇具激贪立懦之助;而对于“学者之书”则应以参悟其治心养气之学为要。对以朱熹为代表的理学书派这一群体的关注,将有利于我们更准确地认知宋后的书学格局与审美走向。而对儒家“载道”书学传统的创造性传承,对我们当下的书法创作与批评也极具价值导向意义。 Zhu Xi in calligraphy writing and book theory are quite accomplished, the most unique person that insisted . As far as calligraphy criticism and acceptance are concerned, he believes that the true trace of the sages of the past should be of the same nature; the legacy of gentlemen of the great carvers can be widely spoken of as human beings; “Scholar of the book,” should be to learn their masters of raising gas for the study. The concern with the group of Neo-Confucianism school represented by Zhu Xi will help us to know more accurately the book pattern and aesthetic trend after the Song Dynasty. However, the creative tradition of Confucianism and the tradition of calligraphy is of great value to our contemporary calligraphy creation and criticism.