论文部分内容阅读
现代生活中,夫妻之间以协议来约定财产的情况越来越多,这本是好事,体现了人们的自我保护意识、维权意识逐渐提高,但是,如果法律知识不够,只知道用生活中的常理来推理自己行为的法律后果,最终可能是哑巴吃黄连——有苦说不出。第一起案例中,梅花处心积虑地与丈夫签订了离婚协议,本以为凭此协议官司胜券在握,却因为自己的理解错误,随手的短短五个字,让“有效”协议成了一张废纸,从而使自己付出了10多万元的代价;而第二起案例中,黄秋生为了自己的一时之气,写下了自认为无效的承诺书,谁知“无效”的废纸却成了有效的协议,而使自己失去了全部的家庭财产,变得一无所有。本期权益纷争栏目选刊的这两起官司,都是“祸起协议”,因为对夫妻间的协议理解不同而产生的纠纷。且看法院是如何理清家务事的呢?
In modern life, the agreement between husband and wife to contract for property is more and more. This is a good thing. It reflects people’s awareness of self-protection and awareness of rights protection. However, if the legal knowledge is not enough, Common sense to reason about the legal consequences of their own behavior, and ultimately may be dumb to eat Coptas - bitterness can not say. The first case, plum deliberately signed a divorce agreement with her husband, this lawsuit that this lawsuit victory in the grip, but because of their own misunderstood, easily short five words, so that the “effective” agreement has become a waste paper , So that they have paid more than 10 million price; and the second case, Anthony Wong for their own moment, wrote a self-denial of commitment, who knows the “invalid” of the waste paper has become effective Of the agreement, leaving himself lost all the family property, become nothing. The two lawsuits in this issue of rights and interests disputes are the “curse agreement” because of disputes over the different understandings of the agreements between husband and wife. And look at the court is how to sort out the housework?