俞平伯终其一生也没有亲眼看到过甲戌本附条,这证明该附条产生于1931年6月之后,即1948年夏季及此后的秋冬之际。主流红学界称北京师大藏本为陶洙抄校整理本,此为学术委婉语。陶洙确有造假牟利的嫌疑。天津王超藏本是现代人蓄意造假的产物,证据确凿。该本造假的意图及性质非常恶劣,业已造成实际误会,情况比较严重。 Yu Pingbo had never witnessed this article in his life, which proves that the attached article came after June 1931, that is, the summer of 1948 and the subsequent fall and winter. The mainstream of red scholars said the Beijing Normal University collection of books as Tao Zhu copied school, this is an academic euphemism. Tao Zhu really fraud for profit suspects. Tianjin Wang Chao collection is a product of deliberate fraud by modern people. There is evidence. The intentions and nature of the counterfeit article were so bad that they had caused actual misunderstandings and the situation was rather serious.