AIM To evaluate the efficacy of doubling time(DT) of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors(GIST).METHODS From April 1987 through November 2012, a total of 323 patients were given a final histopathological diagnosis of GISTs on surgical resection or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) in Kitasato University East Hospital or Kitasato University Hospital. We studied 53 of these patients(34 with resected tumors and 19 with unresected tumors) whose tumors could be measured on EUS on at least two successive occasions. The histopathological diagnosis was GIST in 34 patients, leiomyoma in 5, schwannoma in 3, ectopic pancreas in 1, hamartoma in 1, cyst in 1, Brunner’s adenoma in 1, and spindle-cell tumor in 7. We retrospectively calculated the DT of GISTs on the basis of the time course of EUS findings to estimate the growth rate of such tumors.RESULTS The DT was 17.2 mo for GIST, as compared with 231.2 mo for leiomyoma, 104.7 mo for schwannoma, 274.9mo for ectopic pancreas, 61.2 mo for hamartoma, 49.0 mo for cyst, and 134.7 mo for Brunner’s adenoma. The GISTs were divided into risk classes on the basis of tumor diameters and mitotic figures(Fletcher’s classification). The classification was extremely low risk or low risk in 28 patients, intermediate risk in 3, and high risk in 3. DT of GIST according to risk was 24.0 mo for extremely low-risk plus low-risk GIST, 17.1 mo for intermediate-risk GIST, and 3.9 mo for high-risk GIST. DT of GIST was significantly shorter than that of leiomyoma plus schwannoma(P < 0.05), and DT of high-risk GIST was significantly shorter than that of extremely low-risk plus low-risk GIST(P < 0.05).CONCLUSION For GIST, a higher risk grade was associated with a significantly shorter DT. Small SMTs should initially be followed up within 6 mo after detection. AIM To evaluate the efficacy of doubling time (DT) of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (GIST). METHODS From April 1987 through November 2012, a total of 323 patients were given a final histopathological diagnosis of GISTs on surgical resection or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine- We studied 53 of these patients (34 with resected tumors and 19 with unresected tumors) whose tumors could be measured on EUS on at least two successive occasions. The histopathological (EUS-FNA) in Kitasato University East Hospital or Kitasato University Hospital. diagnosis was GIST in 34 patients, leiomyoma in 5, schwannoma in 3, ectopic pancreas in 1, hamartoma in 1, cyst in 1, Brunner’s adenoma in 1, and spindle-cell tumor in 7. We retrospectively calculated the DT of GISTs on the based on the time course of EUS findings to estimate the growth rate of such tumors. RESULTS The DT was 17.2 mo for GIST, compared with 231.2 mo for leiomyoma, 104.7 mo for schwannoma, 274.9mo for ectopic pancrea s, 61.2 mo for hamartoma, 49.0 mo for cyst, and 134.7 mo for Brunner’s adenoma. The GISTs were divided into risk classes on the basis of tumor diameters and mitotic figures (Fletcher’s classification). The classification was extremely low risk or low risk in 28 patients, intermediate risk in 3, and high risk in 3. DT of GIST according to risk was 24.0 mo for extremely low-risk plus low-risk GIST, 17.1 mo for intermediate-risk GIST, and 3.9 mo for high-risk GIST . DT of GIST was significantly shorter than that of leiomyoma plus schwannoma (P <0.05), and DT of high-risk GIST was significantly shorter than that of extremely low-risk plus low-risk GIST (P <0.05) .CONCLUSION For GIST , a higher risk grade was associated with a significantly shorter DT. Small SMTs should initially be followed up within 6 mo after detection.