Intracanal instrument fracture is an unpredictable and problematic occurrence that can prevent adequatecleaning and shaping procedures and influence the prognosis of endodontic treatment. The prevalence of instrument fracture is reported to range between 0.28% and 16.2%. This article presents an overview of the prevention and management of instruments fractured during endodontic therapy on the basis of literature retrieved from Pub Med and selected journal searches. Instrument fracture occurs because of reduced metal fatigue and/or torsional resistance. The reasons include canal morphology and curvature, manufacturing processes and instrument design, instrument use times and technique, rotational speeds and operator experience. With the development of various equipment and techniques, most of the retained instrument separations can be removed safely. However, in canals without associated periapical disease not every fractured separation should be removed from difficult locations because of the increased risk for root perforation and fracture. In difficult cases, either retain or bypass the fragment in the root canal and ensure regular follow-up reviews. Fractured instruments retained in the presence of periapical disease reduce significantly the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth, indicating a greater need to attempt the removal or bypass of the file separations. Apical surgery might be required in some instances, emphasizing the importance of preventing instrument fracture. The prevalence of instrument fracture is reported to range between 0.28% and 16.2%. This article presents an overview of the prevention and management. Of instruments fractured during endodontic therapy on the basis of literature retrieved from Pub Med and selected journal searches. Instrument reasons: because of reduced metal fatigue and/or torsional resistance. The reasons include canalology and curvature, manufacturing processes and instrument design, instrument use Intervals and technique, rotational speeds and operator experience. With the development of various equipment and techniques, most of the held instrument separations can be removed. safely, yet, in canals without associated periapical disease not every fractured separation should be removed from difficult locations becaus e of the increased risk for root perforation and fracture. in difficult cases, in retain or bypass the fragment in the root canal and promote regular follow-up reviews. Fractured instruments retained in the presence of periapical disease reduce significantly the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth Apical surgery might be required in some instances, emphasizing the importance of preventing instrument fracture.