一百多年来,关于汉语动词的限定性仍然没有较广泛的共识。对有关汉语发展进程中的形态变化的研究粗略梳理表明,以屈折变化为主要依据来判定汉语动词的限定性并不合适。借助沃尔夫的隐性范畴思想以及系统功能语言学的渐变群思想,根据“是否有主语、动词作谓语、动词随人称和数而变化”三项参数,可以区分出介于典型非限定小句和典型限定小句之间的六种情形。汉语的包孕句、连动式、兼语式等语法现象都可以在这些情形中得到阐释。总体来看,汉语中普遍存在假拟非限定小句。 For more than one hundred years, there is still no broad consensus on the definition of Chinese verbs. The research on morphological changes in the process of Chinese language development shows that it is not appropriate to judge the qualifications of Chinese verbs based on inflection. With Wolf’s implicit category thought and the system of functional linguistics gradual group thought, according to “whether there is a subject, the verb as the predicate, the verb with the person and the number of changes ” three parameters, you can distinguish between the typical non Six kinds of situations between the limit clause and the typical limit clause. Grammatical phenomena such as confining sentences, inter-moving sentences and concurrent expressions in Chinese can all be interpreted in these situations. In general, hypothetical non-finite clauses are common in Chinese.