对完善当事人递交诉讼文书制度的思考

来源 :法学探索.贵州省政法管理干部学院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:libowen1
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
我国法律对于人民法院向当事人递交诉讼文书作了相当明确的规定,同时,法律也对当事人向人民法院递交诉讼文书作了规定,只是这些规定比较散乱,加之又无可操作性,因而司法实践中对当事人递交诉讼文书这一制度的贯彻可以说不具体、不完善,或根本未落到实处。特别是当事人递交诉讼文书的时间记载这一问题,多数法院都是以当事人诉讼文书上载明时间为收到日期或根本未注意时间问题。然而,从我国刑事、民事、行政这三大诉讼法来看,当事人递交文书的时间不仅关系到当事人诉讼权利的行使,而且有时还直接影响到当事人的实体权利的保护。因此,笔者认为:完善当事人递交诉讼文书制度,确保当事人的合法权益,应该引起人民法院的高度重视。笔者拟就当事人递交诉讼文书这一制度淡点浅见,以求得同行的共识。 Our law provides fairly clear stipulations for the people’s court to submit litigation documents to the parties. At the same time, the law also provides for the parties to submit litigation documents to the people’s court. However, these provisions are rather arbitrary and inadmissibility. Therefore, in judicial practice The implementation of the system of submitting litigation documents by litigants can be described as specific, imperfect, or simply not implemented. In particular, the parties concerned have recorded the issue at the time of submission of the litigation documents, and most courts have set the time as the date of receipt on the parties’ litigation documents or have not paid any attention to the issue of time. However, judging from the three major procedural laws in our country, such as criminal, civil and administrative matters, the time for the parties to submit instruments not only concerns the exercise of litigation rights of litigants, but also directly affects the protection of the substantive rights of the parties at times. Therefore, I think: to improve the parties to submit the litigation system, to ensure that the parties legitimate rights and interests, should cause the people’s court attach great importance. I intend to submit litigation documents litigation system of the parties a bit humble opinion, in order to obtain the consensus of peers.
其他文献
正值《刑事诉讼法》修改完善及《反贪污贿赂法》立法提上议事日程之际,笔者就当前反贪污贿赂斗争中涉及诉讼程序的若干问题进行探讨,提出笔者的设想与建议,以供立法之参考。
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊
最高人民法院于8月10日至13日在黑龙江省哈尔滨市召开了首次全国法院调查研究工作会议。会议的议题是,总结交流近几年来全国各级法院结合审判实践开展调查研究,为审判工作服
人民检察院是国家的法律监督机关,对宪法和法律在全国的统一正确实施负有重要的职责。实践告诉我们:检察机关要完成法律赋予的光荣而艰巨的任务,必须做到敢于监督与善于监督
经过一年多的治理整顿,我省经济建设开始走上平稳发展的轨道。但是,前些年经济“过热”的困难尚未彻底解决,治理整顿中又出现一些新问题,社会政治经济在平稳发展中仍存在不
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
最高人民法院民事审判庭于1989年11月4日至6日,在北京召开了全国民事审判工作座谈会。28个省、自治区、直辖市高级人民法院和部分中级人民法院的民庭庭长,副庭长参加了座谈会
今年11月7日,是中央革命根据地创建暨中华苏维埃共和国临时中央政府成立60周年纪念日,也是中华苏维埃共和国最高法院创建60周年纪念日。为了广泛深入地开展政治思想教育,继
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.