论文部分内容阅读
我国现行口供收集体现了改善犯罪嫌疑人诉讼主体地位的考虑,如限定了传唤、拘传的时间、地点,赋予犯罪嫌疑人在被第一次讯问后或采取强制措施之日起聘请律师帮助的权利。然而,由于我国口供收集制度在立法指导思想和价值选择上过分强调国家利益和实体公正,轻视个人权利和程序公正,过分强调犯罪控制和诉讼效率,忽视犯罪嫌疑人的权利保护和对公正程序的追求,造成口供收集过程中人权保障机制的不健全。
The current collection of confessions in our country reflects the consideration of improving the status of criminal suspects. For instance, it limits the time and location of summoning and arresting, and gives the suspect the right to hire a lawyer for help after the first interrogation or enforcement measures . However, due to the excessive emphasis on national interests and substantive justice in the legislative guiding ideology and value choice, the system of collecting and providing confessions in our country lays emphasis on individual rights and procedural fairness, overemphasizes the efficiency of crime control and litigation, ignores the criminal suspect’s rights protection and the fair procedure Pursuit, resulting in the collection of oral confession of human rights protection mechanism is not perfect.