论文部分内容阅读
目的了解建平县公共场所室内空气卫生质量的状况,为制定科学的监督管理方法提供依据。方法依据GB/T17220-1998《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》对建平县公共场所空气进行监测;依据GB/T 18204.3-2013《公共场所卫生检验方法第3部分》标准进行菌落总数检验测定;依据GB 9663~9673-1996《公共场所各类卫生标准》和GB 16153-1996《饭馆(餐厅)卫生标准》相应的国家标准进行评价及判定。结果 2012~2014年共监测公共场所空气14 340项次,合格13 747项次,合格率为95.86%。不同行业监测指标合格率分别为美容美发97.55%、旅店业96.54%、文化娱乐场所95.62%、饭店餐厅95.34%、商场书店95.10%(P>0.05)。总体合格率县城(96.81%)高于乡镇(94.91%)(P>0.05)。其中一氧化碳合格率县城(99.88%)高于乡镇(98.62%)(P<0.01)。二氧化碳合格率县城(97.51%)高于乡镇(85.01%)(P<0.01)。不同季节合格率分别为96.08%、99.07%、96.09%、90.24%(P>0.05),不同季节二氧化碳、相对湿度合格率不同(P<0.01)。结论建平县公共场所空气卫生质量总体良好,个别指标合格率较低。
Objective To understand the status of indoor air hygienic quality in public places in Jianping County and provide basis for establishing scientific supervision and management methods. Methods According to GB / T17220-1998 “public places health monitoring technical specifications” Jianping County public places to monitor air; according to GB / T 18204.3-2013 “public places health inspection methods Part 3” standard colony count test; based on GB 9663 ~ 9673-1996 “Public places of all kinds of health standards” and GB 16153-1996 “Restaurant (restaurant) health standards,” the corresponding national standards for evaluation and determination. Results A total of 14 340 air-conditioned public places were monitored in 2012 and 2014, and 13 747 passions were passed, with a pass rate of 95.86%. The passing rate of monitoring indicators in different industries were 97.55% for beauty salons, 96.54% for hotels, 95.62% for places of cultural entertainment, 95.34% for restaurants and 95.10% for shopping malls (P> 0.05). The overall pass rate of the county seat (96.81%) higher than the township (94.91%) (P> 0.05). Among them, the qualified rate of carbon monoxide in county seat (99.88%) was higher than that in township (98.62%) (P <0.01). The passing rate of carbon dioxide county (97.51%) was higher than that of township (85.01%) (P <0.01). The pass rates in different seasons were 96.08%, 99.07%, 96.09% and 90.24%, respectively (P> 0.05). The passing rates of carbon dioxide and relative humidity were different in different seasons (P <0.01). Conclusion The air hygiene quality in public places in Jianping County is generally good, and the pass rate of individual indicators is low.