论文部分内容阅读
20世纪80年代,“编辑学者化”讨论兴起,一时观点交锋论争热烈,绵延至今。回溯“编辑学者化”的源起,可见思想和实践两条路径。仅就思想路径而言,在“编辑学者化”之前,还有“审判官”说、“催生婆”说、“杂家”说等。它们都在某种程度上反映了编辑工作和编辑职业的一些特点,但随着时代的发展,它们都有了诸多与现实不相适应的地方。“编辑学者化”思路就是在这一背景下提出来的。林辰先生是这一思想的最先倡导者之一,也是当时出版界推崇的学者型编辑的典型代表。本文旨在梳理林辰先生编辑思想的演变过程,尤其是他的“编辑学者化”思路的形成过程。
In the 1980s, discussions on the issue of scholarly scholars began to rise up, and the heated debate over the confrontation between the two points of view lasted till now. Backtracking “editor scholarly ” source, can see two paths of thought and practice. Just as far as the ideological path is concerned, before the editors of “scholarly scholars”, there are “judges” that say “mothers” say, “mothers” and so on. All of them reflect some of the features of editorial work and editorial work to a certain extent. However, with the development of the times, they all have many places that are incompatible with reality. “Edit scholarship ” train of thought is proposed in this context. Mr. Lin Chen was one of the first advocates of this thought, and was also a typical representative of the scholarly editors whom the publishing industry respected. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the evolutionary process of Mr. Lin Chen’s editorial thoughts, especially the formation of his “scholarly scholarly” ideas.