论文部分内容阅读
20世纪初,科学主义的僭妄使在中国尚属新兴学科之哲学的面目愈加模糊,地位日益衰落、价值弥为虚妄。临此哲学危境,方东美批判科学主义“齐物论”的僭妄对物质科学、心理科学、人类文化和精神的危害,拨正时人关于科学与哲学的四大惑见,并客观、平等地辩证二者在主体气质、学科性质、志趣、视阈、方法、致思趋向、宇宙观等九个方面的分别,并从人类文化观视阈考论史上“宗教的”、“科学的”、“人文的”三大哲学径路或形态之优劣,指明“困难最少的人本主义途径”才是人类哲学唯一可以积健为雄的未来走向与正途。
At the beginning of the 20th century, the scientism delirium made the appearance of the philosophy of emerging science in China increasingly blurred, its position deteriorating day by day, and its value was illusory. At this philosophical crisis, Fang Dongmei criticized the scruples of scientism and “homogeneous objects theory” for harming physical science, psychological science, human culture and spirit, calling upon four major confusions about science and philosophy of the contemporary people, And objectively and equally dialectically distinguish the nine aspects of the subject temperament, subject nature, hobby, visual threshold, method, thought tendency, cosmology and so on, and from the perspective of human culture, , “Scientific”, “humanistic” three philosophical approaches or patterns, indicating that “the least difficult way of humanism” is the only human philosophy can Jijianweixiong future trends and Right way.