论文部分内容阅读
在当代西方女性主义政治哲学中,艾利斯·马瑞恩·杨以其“差异的公民资格”与“差异政治”而独具特色。从对罗尔斯为代表的自由主义普遍公民资格的批判出发,她说明了自由主义普遍公民资格如何忽略或至少是回避了差异及差异群体的权利要求。她以差异的公民资格为切入点,揭示出女性主义政治哲学之差异正义的根本理论诉求,这不仅为女性等差异性群体争取自身权利指明了方向,也试图以另外一种新的视角,即公民资格的理论视角,冲击传统意义上普遍主义的正义理解。在当代多元文化的广阔背景下,差异的公民资格和差异平等的正义观照正越来越成为差异性群体争取自身权利的理论武器,而差异正义的独特理论诉求也正日益成为普遍正义的一种有意义的补充。
In the contemporary western feminist political philosophy, Alice Marion Yang is unique in his “Differentiated Citizenship” and “Difference Politics.” Starting from the critique of the qualifications of liberal universal citizenship represented by Rawls, she shows how liberal universal citizenship can ignore or at least evade the claims of differences and differences among groups. Taking the difference of citizenship as the starting point, she reveals the fundamental theoretical demands of the difference and justice of feminist political philosophy. This not only points out the direction for the different groups such as women to win their own rights, but also attempts to use another new perspective The theoretical perspective of citizenship impinges on the universal understanding of justice in the traditional sense. In the contemporary context of multiculturalism, the differential perspectives on citizenship and differential equality are increasingly becoming the theoretical weapons for different groups to fight for their own rights, and the unique theoretical claim of difference and justice is increasingly becoming a universal justice Meaningful additions.