论文部分内容阅读
近几年高考阅卷,在倡导真实的文风,反对抄袭和宿构的大前提下,阅卷老师往往对文笔老练、构思精巧的上等佳作产生怀疑,只要有人能提供蛛丝马迹证明该文与某篇文章相似,该文就会被打入冷宫,得到最低一档的分数。2001年江苏省近30万考生仅《赤兔之死》一文被批为满分作文,岂不怪哉?对于相当一部分考生来说,又岂不冤哉?抄袭和宿构固然要反对,但这种草木皆兵的做法损害了部分考生的切身利益,更严重的是它会将学生的写作学习
In recent years, under the premise of advocating true style of writing and opposing plagiarism and constitutionality, the marking students are often skeptical about the sophisticated writing and sophisticated fine works, as long as someone can provide clues to prove the article and an article. Similarly, the article will be thrown into the cold and get the lowest score. In 2001, nearly 300,000 candidates in Jiangsu Province were only awarded a perfect score in the article “The Death of Red Rabbit”. Is this not surprising? For a large number of candidates, plagiarism and constitution are opposed, but this is true. The practice of planting all kinds of soldiers damages the immediate interests of some candidates. What’s more serious is that it will learn writing for students.