《内经》在讨论具体病证时,例举了十多首方剂;并提出了一系列制方学思想,这些内容,历来为医家所重视,特别是“君臣佐使”说,更被视为制方之圭皋,但如何看待《内经》方及其君臣佐使,以及相互间的关系,却鲜有精论。笔者试从《内经》方的历史性、它为什么与君臣佐使说不尽一致方面,作一初步探讨。一、关于《内经》方首先,要认识《内经》方的性质。《内经》属汉七家医经之一,是主要讨论“血脉、经络、骨髓、阴阳、表里,以起百病之本,死生之分,而用度箴石汤火所施,调百药齐和之所宜”等中医基本理论的著作,与 In the discussion of specific disease certificates, the “Neijing” gave an example of more than a dozen prescriptions, and proposed a series of systemic thinking ideas. These contents have always been valued by doctors, especially the “Monarchs and Ministers”, and they are considered to be more However, there are few comments on how to treat the “Nei Jing” party and its officials and ministers, as well as the relationship between them. The author tries to make a preliminary discussion on the historical nature of the “Nei Jing” side and why it is not consistent with the officials and officials. First, on the “Neijing” side, we must first understand the nature of the “Neijing” side. The Neijing is one of the seven Chinese Medical Classics. It is mainly discussed in terms of blood, meridians, bone marrow, yin and yang, and the epitome of the disease. The basic theories of Chinese medicine, such as medicine and medicine, should be appropriate, and