审查基准是宪政发达的国家在审查宪法案件时,为了确定审查对象是否合宪,通过案件积累而发展出的技术规范。要建立全新的、开放的、透明的违宪审查制度,其重点在于对违宪审查基准的选择。本文通过介绍违宪审查的基准,比较分析了德国和美国模式,提出我国的违宪审查基准可采取三重审查基准框架,采取以人权保障为核心,“内心—外围”式的审查强度归类方法,并对我国现行宪法中公民的基本权利进行了不同的强度类型划分,对建构符合我国国情的违宪审查基准提出了初步设想。 Benchmarking is the technical specification developed by the constitutional developed countries in the constitutional case review to determine whether the object under examination is constitutional or not, and the cases are accumulated. To establish a new, open and transparent system of constitutional review, the focus is on the choice of the basis for the review of constitutionality. This paper introduces the benchmark of unconstitutional review, comparatively analyzes the model of Germany and the United States, puts forward the framework of triple review of China’s review of unconstitutionality, and adopts the reviewing intensity classification method with core of human rights protection , And carried out different types of intensity classification of the basic rights of citizens in the current constitution of our country, and put forward the tentative plan to construct the basis for violating the constitutional review in line with China’s national conditions.