论文部分内容阅读
“337”电池案之所以在全国引起强烈的反响,是因为它是中国企业在应对美国“337”大棒以来惟一获得全胜的官司。从1986年我国皮毛大衣遭遇美国“337”调查后,接连不断,今年前8个月就遭遇7起。中国企业几乎是连连溃败。让中国企业窝火的是,败诉很大原因不是自己没理,是对“337”调查的陌生。所以,我们特意请北京市展达律师事务所主任张伟来重点介绍一下有关“337”的法律问题。
The “337” battery case has aroused strong repercussions across the country because it is the only case that Chinese companies have been victorious against in response to the “337” stick in the United States. From 1986, China’s fur coat encountered the United States “337” survey, one after another in the first eight months of this year, encountered seven. Chinese companies are victorious in succession. Fighting fire for Chinese companies is that the reason for losing a lot is not because they did not ignore the “337” survey. Therefore, we specially invite Zhang Weilai, director of Beijing Zhanda Law Firm, to highlight the legal issues concerning “337”.