“服制定罪”创制探原

来源 :现代法学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wbgbg
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
瞿同祖在研究中国古代法律变迁时指出,《晋律》开以“服制定罪”之先河,该观点对学界颇有影响。然稽诸两汉史籍及出土简牍资料,多有以五服治罪之案例、律令、诏书和律章句。深度探究发现,汉代为缓和社会矛盾及加强社会治理,全面推行丧服礼制,自觉运用服制限制秦夷族连坐遗风,禁止亲属间的违礼相犯。随着丧服之礼与律令的有机渗透,至东汉中后期,服叙已成为处置相关案件的参照标准或基本依据,还形成了“礼教与是非曲直并重”的司法模式。这些环节在相关史料中都得以显现,展示了“服制定罪”在汉代发展、创制的完整过程。 In his study of the vicissitudes of ancient Chinese law, Qu Tongzu pointed out that “Jin Law” is the forerunner of “serving conviction” and this view has an influence on the academic community. However, both the Han Dynasty Ji Ji Han Dynasty unearthed historical records and information, there are five cases of crime, law, edict and rule sentences. Deep exploration found that the Han Dynasty to ease social conflicts and strengthen social governance, the full implementation of mourning rituals, and consciously use the service system to restrict the qi and the Yi people even legacy, prohibit infidelity between relatives. With the organic infiltration of the mourning ceremony and the decrees, it has become the reference standard or basis for the handling of related cases in the middle and late Eastern Han Dynasty, and has also formed the judicial mode of “both ritual education and right and wrong”. These links have been revealed in the relevant historical materials, demonstrating the complete process of development and creation of “serving sin ” in the Han Dynasty.
其他文献
私人协商已成为当代社会最重要的纠纷解决机制之一。但现行法中的规范缺失以及和解合同自身的复杂性,使得法律适用变得困难,导致民众对其失去信心。与此同时,诉讼法的指导案