条约文本与实践的互动,提供了观察近代中国主权丧失的新视角。鸦片战争之后签订的不平 等条约,是上海港引水权丧失的法理基础。基于条约文本之上的不对称性实践,才是引水权丧失的持续动因 和深层内容。但后人往往忽略这种互动,误将“文本”当作历史。 The interaction of treaty texts and practices provides a new perspective for observing the loss of sovereignty in modern China. The unequal treaties signed after the Opium War are the legal basis for the loss of the right of water diversion in Shanghai Port. The asymmetric practice based on the treaty texts is the continuous motivation and deep content of the loss of water right. However, later generations often neglect this kind of interaction, mistaking “text” for history.