论文部分内容阅读
近来,我参加县视导工作,发现不少学生的作文不真实,普遍存在三多:抄袭的多,编造的多,说大话、空话、无病呻吟的多。何以产生这些情况?关键是有些学校的作文教学上有问题。有的教师指导作文,从“小学生作文选”中找范文给学生读,学生写作文,从中抄袭,美其名曰:“参考”,“仿作”。还有些教师指导学生作文,习惯出传统题目,出老题目。上课指导简单化,公式化,先是明确中心思想,接着谈话,指出写什么,再接着指导列提纲,最后说几点注意点就了事。学生作文时,还是没有东西可写,便抄袭,便编造。聪明的孩子读的书多一点,象搞创作一样,编造情节。有个女学生在命题作文《我学会了×××》时,写《我学会了游泳》,文章写得生动活泼。我看了这篇文章,将信将疑。经过了解,这
Recently, I participated in the work of the county guide and found that many students' compositions are not true, and there are more than three common types of plagiarism: plagiarism, fabrication, talkative, empty talk, and ill moan. What makes these situations happen? The crux of the matter is that some schools have problems teaching compositions. Some teachers guide the composition, from the “Pupils Essay Selection” to find the Pham Van to students to read, student writing, plagiarism, the United States said its name: “Reference”, “Imitation.” There are also some teachers to guide students writing, accustomed to the traditional topics, the old topic. Class guidance simplistic, formulaic, first clear the central idea, then talk, pointed out that what to write, and then guide the outline of the column, and finally said something to note. Students writing, or nothing to write, then plagiarism, they fabricated. Clever children to read a little more books, like engaging in creative, fabricating the plot. There is a female student writing proposition “I learned × × ×”, write “I learned to swim,” the article is vivid and vivid. I read this article, the letter doubtful. After understanding, this