在大陆法系国家,普遍认为存在三种物权的变动的模式,即债权意思主义物权变动模式,债权形式主义物权变动模式,物权形式主义物权变动模式。此三种模式争议的焦点在于对物权行为理论的取舍,本文分析了物权行为独立性及物权行为无因性存在的必要性和可能性,从而得出物权形式主义的物权变动模式是当今立法的首选的结论。 In the civil law countries, it is generally believed that there are three kinds of changes in the mode of real right, that is, the change of real estate creditor’s right, the real right of change of creditor’s right and the formal change of real right of real right. The focus of these three modes of controversy lies in the choice of the theory of real rights and behavior. This paper analyzes the necessity and possibility of the independence of property rights and the non-causal nature of the real rights and acts, The model is the preferred conclusion of today’s legislation.