论文部分内容阅读
目的了解初产妇分娩时施予无保护分娩助产技术对其生活质量、会阴侧切情况产生的影响。方法选择2014年1月—2017年6月进入本院产科需分娩的初产妇100例作为研究对象。以助产技术差异分组:甲组(50例)分娩环节施予无保护助产技术,乙组(50例)施予传统助产技术,并记录两组患者的生活质量及其会阴部位侧切情况。结果甲组中共10例(20.00%)会阴侧切,乙组中有30例(60.00%),组间数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);甲组产妇生活质量各因子计分结果均高于乙组,组间数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论当初产妇接受分娩时,施予无保护助产技术十分可靠,推荐产科优先选择。
Objective To understand the effects of unprotected childbirth midwifery on the quality of life and perineal circumfluence of primipara during childbirth. Methods A total of 100 primipara from January 2014 to June 2017 in our obstetric department were selected as research subjects. Group A (50 cases) were given unprotected midwifery technology, Group B (50 cases) were given traditional midwifery technology, and the quality of life and perineal circumflanction of the two groups were recorded . Results In group A, 10 cases (20.00%) had episiotomy, 30 cases (60.00%) in group B, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05) Were higher than the B group, the data between groups, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion When the primipara received childbirth, the technique of giving unprotected midwifery was very reliable and the obstetric preference was recommended.