论文部分内容阅读
从程序正义的角度讲,陪审制度是在追求公正陪审团,而不是民主的陪审团,因为民主与正义是两个不同的概念,有不同的价值追求,民主追求的人民当家作主,而司法追求的是公正。陪审团在遴选阶段中,预先审核、无理由剔除、有理由剔除等制度性规定,就违背了民主的平等性要求,是按照程序正义的要求来设计的,目的是追求公正的陪审团。在坚持民主的前提下,努力使陪审团成为协商民主的制度角色,最大限度地追求司法公正,是陪审团制度自我完善和改进的方向。
From the perspective of procedural justice, the jury system is pursuing an impartial jury instead of a democratic jury because democracy and justice are two different concepts, with different value pursuits and democratically pursued people as their own masters, while judicature The pursuit of justice. In the process of selection, the jury in the selection stage, the pre-examination, no reason to remove, reason to exclude other institutional provisions, on the contrary to the democratic equality requirements, is designed according to the procedural justice requirements, the purpose is to pursue a just jury. Under the premise of upholding democracy, striving to make the jury the institutionalized role of consultative democracy and pursuing the judicial fair to the maximum extent are the directions for the jury system to make self-improvement and improvement.