高中文理分科,分还是不分?仍是个问题。考察民国时期学者对于文理分科的看法可以发现,当年讨论文理分科的代表立场和坚持理由与当今有诸多相似之处,以学者专家为代表的“理想派”从学生素质出发主张取消文理分科,而以学生、家长和学校为代表的“现实派”从学生负担出发坚持维持现状。文理分科的实质是理想与现实不断博弈的过程。 It is still a problem that high school Chinese science and technology should not be divided or divided. When examining the scholars’ views on liberal arts and sciences in the period of the Republic of China, we can find out that the representative positions and persistence reasons for discussing liberal arts and science divisions in that year have many similarities with today, and the “idealists” represented by scholars and experts advocate the abolition of arts and sciences according to their qualities , While “realists” represented by students, parents and schools insist on maintaining the status quo from the student’s burden. The essence of liberal arts is the process of constant game between ideal and reality.