论文部分内容阅读
选择种有“美国八号”(早熟)、“嘎啦”(中熟)、“富士”(晚熟)的混栽果园4片(各2/3hm~2)为研究对象,设置4个处理(分别为有色防鸟网、风动叶轮、超声波、生物驱避剂),对比了4种鸟雀驱避技术,调查其驱避效果,以筛选出最优的鸟雀驱避技术。结果表明:在相同品种条件下,4种鸟雀驱避技术防鸟害的有效程度以有色防鸟网驱避效果最好,持效性最长,稳定性最好;其受啄率分别为“美国八号”0.44%、“嘎啦”0.16%、“富士”0.20%。其次为生物驱避剂,其受啄率分别为“美国八号”1.92%、“嘎啦”2.24%、“富士”1.52%。然后为超声波驱避技术,其受啄率分别为“美国八号”9.64%、“嘎啦”5.56%,“富士”3.24%。驱避效果最差、持效性最短、稳定性最差的是风动叶轮驱鸟,其受啄率分别为“美国八号”10.00%、“嘎啦”6.52%、“富士”2.60%。3个品种综合调查结果表明,早熟苹果受啄率最高,其次是中熟品种,受啄率最低的是晚熟品种。
Select 4 mixed planted orchards (2 / 3hm ~ 2) with “American 8” (premature), “Gala” (medium ripe) and “Fuji” , Four treatments (colored bird net, wind impeller, ultrasonic wave, biological repellent) were set up. The four types of bird repellent technology were compared and their repellent effect was investigated to screen out the best birdwatching Avoid technology. The results showed that under the same variety conditions, the effectiveness of the four kinds of bird repellent technology repellent technology was the best repellent effect, the longest effective and the best stability; the pecking rate was “United States on the 8th” 0.44%, “Gala ” 0.16%, “Fuji ” 0.20%. Followed by biological repellent, its pecking rate were “United States on the 8th ” 1.92%, “Gala ” 2.24%, “Fuji ” 1.52%. Then for the ultrasonic repellent technology, the pecking rate is respectively 9.64% for American 8, 5.56% for Gala, and 3.24% for Fuji. Repellent effect of the worst, the shortest holding, the stability of the worst is the impeller driven birds, the pecking rate was “American 8 ” 10.00%, “Gala ” 6.52%, Fuji "2.60%. Comprehensive survey results of three varieties showed that the early pecking apple was the highest pecking rate, followed by medium maturing varieties, pecking rate is the lowest late-maturing varieties.