论文部分内容阅读
地方政府回应通过促进公共理性的互动交流来推进善治,而公民论坛活动则是在社会政策层面推进地方政府回应的重要举措。我国已有一些城市开展了“公民论坛”活动,其中南京市的“市民论坛”活动为其他城市树立了榜样。然而诸如“市民论坛”之类的民主政治改革能否肩负推动地方政府回应与中国基层民主成长的重任?笔者分别于2006年和2008年对南京市的“市民论坛”活动进行了深入地延续性调研,以更进一步了解真实世界中公民论坛活动开展的现状,剖析影响和制约公民论坛活动深入开展的深层原因及其背后的逻辑,期望为我国其他城市开展公民论坛活动以及建构和完善地方政府的回应机制提供数据支持和可资借鉴的模式选择。
Local government response promotes good governance by promoting interactive exchanges of public reason, while Citizens Forum is an important measure to promote local government’s response at the social policy level. Some cities in our country have launched the “Citizen Forum”, in which Nanjing’s “Citizen Forum” set an example for other cities. However, democratic reforms like “Civic Forum” can shoulder the responsibility of promoting local government’s response to the growth of grassroots democracy in China. In 2006 and 2008, the author carried out the “Citizen Forum” activities in Nanjing Depth investigation and continuous investigation to further understand the status quo of citizen forum activities in the real world and to analyze the underlying causes and the logic behind the activities that affect and constrain civil forum activities in depth and expect to carry out citizen forum activities in other cities in our country and to construct Improve the local government response mechanism to provide data support and learn from the model options.