民主协商性执法并不是当事人之间超越法律规定的自由合意,而是在依法的前提下,确认相关法律事实,落实利益平衡点,采取一种文明的、理性的对抗方式,通过一个自愿选择的过程,实现各方利益的平衡,寻求最佳解决方案。事实证明,民主协商性公安执法范式充分体现了当事人之间的利益互惠,能够有效地实现公安机关与当事人之间权力与权利的平衡,较好地实现执法公平与效率的平衡。因此,针对当前公安机关执法状况不理想的现实状况,我们可以将民主协商理论应用到公安执法中,努力构建中立性、参与性、公开性的商谈程序,从而在公安机关与利害关系人之间建立起长期、稳定的信任与合作关系,使当事人“心悦诚服”地履行公安机关对纠纷的裁定。 The democratic deliberative law enforcement is not a matter of free will between the parties to go beyond the legal provisions, but on the premise of law, to confirm the relevant legal facts, to implement the balance of interests, to adopt a civilized and rational way of confrontation, through a voluntary choice Process, to achieve the balance of interests of all parties, to find the best solution. Facts have proved that the democratic and consultative public security enforcement model fully reflects the reciprocity of interest among the parties, can effectively balance the power and rights between the public security organs and the parties, and better balances the fairness and efficiency of law enforcement. Therefore, in view of the reality that the current law enforcement situation in the public security organs is not satisfactory, we can apply the theory of democratic consultation to public security and law enforcement and strive to establish a neutral, participatory and open negotiation procedure so that public security organs and stakeholders Establish a long-term and stable relationship of trust and cooperation, and enable the parties concerned to fulfill the ruling of the public security organs on disputes with determination and sincerity.