论文部分内容阅读
英国行政裁判所程序区别于法院严格的裁判程序。行政裁判所的种类繁多,各裁判所受理的案件差异大,无法制定一部适用于一切行政裁判所的程序法典来对程序规则作统一规定。行政裁判所适用的程序规则不同于我国行政复议程序规则,主要有对抗主义模式、言词审理原则、不受严格证据规则约束、裁决依多数人通过和不严守先例、上诉程序多元等规则。该程序规则的可取之处对完善我国行政复议程序有一定借鉴价值。
The procedures of the United Kingdom Administrative Tribunal differ from the strict court procedures. There are many kinds of administrative tribunals, and the cases accepted by the various tribunals are quite different. Therefore, it is impossible to formulate a procedural code applicable to all administrative tribunals to make uniform provisions on procedural rules. The rules of procedure applicable to administrative adjudication are different from the rules of the administrative reconsideration procedure in our country. They are mainly confrontationalism model and word trial principle, which are not subject to strict rules of evidence, and are ruled by rules that the majority passes and does not strictly observe the precedent and the appeal procedure is pluralistic. The merits of the procedural rules have some reference value for perfecting our country’s administrative reconsideration procedure.