论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨孕妇的依恋类型、社会支持及两者之间的关系。方法:采用关系问卷(RQ)和亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版,以及社会支持量表,对1070名孕妇进行问卷调查。结果:①孕妇的依恋类型分布:安全型64.0%、轻视型17.8%、倾注型14.2%、害怕型4.1%;②四种依恋类型的孕妇在“主观支持”得分上没有显著性差异,但在“客观支持”得分上,安全型(10.39±3.47)显著高于轻视型(9.21±3.11)、倾注型(9.20±3.08)和害怕型(9.17±3.73,F(3,1030)=9.83,P<0.01)。在“支持利用度”得分上,安全型(8.32±1.92)显著高于轻视型(7.64±1.86)、倾注型(7.57±1.70)和害怕型(7.60±1.95,F(3,1030)=11.51,P<0.05)。③依恋回避与“支持利用度”(r=-0.205,P<0.01)和“总的社会支持”(r=-0.230,P<0.01)呈显著负相关。④依恋焦虑与“客观支持”(r=-0.111,P<0.01)、“总的社会支持”(r=-0.123,P<0.01)均呈显著负相关。
Objective: To explore the types of pregnant women, social support and the relationship between the two. Methods: 1070 pregnant women were surveyed by using the Chinese Version of Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) and Intimate Relationship Extensions (ECR), and the Social Support Scale. Results: ①The distribution of attachment type of pregnant women was 64.0% for safe type, 17.8% for despised type, 14.2% for pouring type and 4.1% for fear type; ②The pregnant women with four attachment types had no significant difference in the score of “subjective support” (10.39 ± 3.47) was significantly higher than that of mild type (9.21 ± 3.11), pour type (9.20 ± 3.08) and dread type (9.17 ± 3.73, F (3,1030)) in the “objective support” = 9.83, P <0.01). The safety score (8.32 ± 1.92) was significantly higher in patients with “Support Utilization” score than in patients with mild (7.64 ± 1.86), pours (7.57 ± 1.70) and dreaded (7.60 ± 1.95, F = 11.51, P <0.05). (3) There was a significant negative correlation between attachment avoidance and “support utility ” (r = -0.205, P <0.01) and “total social support ” (r = -0.230, P <0.01). (4) There was a significant negative correlation between attachment anxiety and “objective support ” (r = -0.111, P <0.01) and “total social support ” (r = -0.123, P <0.01).