论文部分内容阅读
科泽勒克和阿尔托格认为,在欧洲近代史上,过去的经验和期待的视阈之间的关系经历了重大转变。在某种意义上,我们可以依据阿尔托格提出的“历史时间形态”来理解现代性和后现代,这一术语同样涉及过去与未来的关系。在现代性的历史时间形态中,经验空间与期待视阈之间产生了距离,未来不应是过去的延续;在这种语境下,“历史”这一概念也有着特殊的含义,它强调的是时间中呈现出的变革和进步。这一现代的历史一时间观,可以解释黑格尔等人对于东方社会的某些判断。
Kozlerik and Altog argue that in the modern history of Europe there has been a major shift in the relationship between past experience and the horizon of expectations. In a sense, we can understand the relationship between modernity and postmodernity based on the “historical time structure” put forward by Altoge. The term also refers to the relationship between the past and the future. In the modern historical time form, there is a distance between the experience space and the expectation threshold, and the future should not be a continuation of the past; in this context, the notion of “history” also has a special meaning, It emphasizes the changes and advances in time. This modern historical-time view can explain some of Hegel’s and others’ judgments about Eastern societies.