我国《刑法》第二百六十九条中关于事后抢劫的主观构成要件的规定看似清楚明了,实际上稍有惩罚范围过宽之嫌,要正确理解此规定的含义进而正确适用,就必须以实质解释为方法,以事后抢劫与一般抢劫的同质性为标准对事后抢劫主观要件的相关规定进行合理合法的限制解释。 The provisions of subjective constitutional elements of post-mortem robbery in Article 269 of the Criminal Law of our country appear to be plain and clear. Actually, there is a suspicion that the scope of punishment is too wide. If we correctly understand the meaning of this provision and apply it correctly, we must With the method of substantive explanation, taking the homogeneity of the subsequent robbery and general robbery as the standard, the relevant provisions of the subjective requirements of post-robbery are reasonably and legally restricted and explained.