这篇文章的论点可以概括为:建筑需要同等程度的互通[Involvement]和发明[Invention]。一旦人们意识到我们生活的世界是文脉和建筑成果共生的事实——全盘文脉和局部成果,这种双重任务就变得明晰起来。尽管这个论点持有其相反的一面:设计过程中预见性的创造文脉不一定成立,即便它是对应设计过程的特定成果,我还是主张这个论点。建筑和其它艺术分享建构世界的任务,这里所说的世界不是地球的意思。物质的自然是它的一部分,但我所理解的世界是一个习 The argument of this article can be summarized as: Architecture requires the same level of interoperability [Involvement] and invention [Invention]. The double task becomes clear once people realize that the world we live in is the fact that context and building symbiosis live together - the entire context and the local outcome. Although this argument holds the opposite side: the predictive creative context in the design process does not necessarily hold, even though it is a specific outcome that corresponds to the design process, I would argue for this argument. Architecture and other arts share the task of building the world. The world here is not what Earth means. The nature of matter is a part of it, but the world I understand is a habit