论文部分内容阅读
在左翼叙事中,革命知识者走向革命通常被表述为在革命的真理性召唤下以“去知识者化”的姿态告别自我,试图与工农完全同质化而获得与革命的同一性,然而对于那些步入革命之旅并被接纳之后的知识分子的描写却令人感到游移和暧昧;萧军笔下的萧明显然是一个异数,他的“逆子”特性,注定了革命知识阶级在阶级革命的历史进程中始终是一个历史悲情角色。
In the left-wing narrative, the revolutionary intellectuals turned to the revolution is usually expressed as bid farewell to themselves under the revolutionary truth of truth, trying to homogeneity with workers and peasants to gain the same identity with revolution, However, the descriptions of intellectuals who embarked on a journey of revolution and were accepted were rather vague and ambiguous. Xiao Ming’s appraisal of Xiao Jun was obviously an algebra. His “traitor” character was destined to revolutionize knowledge Class in the history of class revolution has always been a history of tragedy.