论文部分内容阅读
发轫于 2 0世纪 6 0年代的后现代主义是对西方的文艺、哲学、美学、社会学、语言学、历史学、心理学等众多领域产生重大影响的一股思潮。传入我国后 ,亦在诸多学科领域引起不小的反响 ,历史学当然也不例外。如何看待这一思潮及其对我国史学研究的影响 ,已经引起史学界的普遍关注。为此 ,本刊特邀请有关学者就这一问题从不同角度予以探讨。在本组文章中 ,赞成者、反对者、困惑者均有之 ,在某种程度上可以说代表了我国史学界对后现代思潮的几种主要态度 ,希望本组文章的刊发能对这一问题的研究有所推动。
Developed in the 1960s, postmodernism was a trend of thought that had a significant impact on many fields of Western literature and art, philosophy, aesthetics, sociology, linguistics, history and psychology. After it was introduced into our country, it also aroused great repercussions in many academic fields. Of course, history is no exception. How to treat this trend of thought and its impact on the study of history in our country has drawn the widespread attention of historians. To this end, we have invited relevant scholars on this issue from different angles to be explored. In this essay, the pro-opponents and the puzzled ones all have, to some extent, they can represent the main attitude of the historians of our country to the post-modernism. I hope this article can be published A problem of research has been promoted.