公有制与商品经济究竟能否相容?人们对此还有不少疑虑.前一时期,一些人主张私有化,也正是在这个问题上发难.他们认为,要坚持公有制为主体,就无法真正搞商品经济.加上现实生活中确有一些问题未得到解决,如企业还未做到自负盈亏、自我约束,存在短期行为.因此,对商品经济与公有制能否真正结合的问题还需要进一步解决.我以为,公有制与商品经济能否结合,主要应回答三个问题:一是公有制条件下是否具有商品经济存在的经济根源;二是商品经济关系与公有制经济关系是否具有统一性(即商品经济是否能为公有制经济服务);三是公有制企业能否自负盈亏、自我约束,成为商品生产者.对于第一、第二个问题我们已取得基本一致、肯定的意见.于是,现阶段必须发展有计划商品经济的观念已逐渐得到确立.然而,在改革过程 Whether or not public ownership and commodity economy are compatible? There are still many doubts about this. In the previous period, some people advocated privatization. It was precisely because of this issue that they had difficulties. They believed that if we insist on public ownership as the main body, we cannot really Engaging in commodity economy. Coupled with real-life problems that haven’t been solved, such as companies have not yet become self-financing, self-restraining, and have short-term behavior. Therefore, the question of whether the commodity economy and the public ownership can be truly integrated needs to be further addressed. I think that the combination of public ownership and commodity economy should mainly answer three questions: First, whether there is an economic root of commodity economy under the conditions of public ownership; second is whether there is a unity between the relationship of commodity economy and public ownership (that is, commodity economy). Whether it can serve the public sector economy.) Third, whether the publicly owned enterprises can assume their own profits and losses and become self-restrained and become commodity producers. We have achieved basically consistent and positive opinions on the first and second issues. Therefore, we must develop at this stage. The concept of planned commodity economy has gradually been established. However, during the reform process