论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验中文版自我结构量表SCS的信度和效度。方法:对642名大学生实施自我结构量表、流调中心用抑郁量表和学生日常生活和学习应激量表。结果:中文版SCS由2个因子组成,各维度的条目负荷在0.518~0.743之间,累积解释总方差的52.1%。各维度的内部一致性系数分别为0.77和0.73,总量表和两个分量表在一个月后的重测信度分别为0.84,0.79和0.83。中文SCS的两个分两表与抑郁和应激的总分相关系数在-0.32~0.53之间。结论:中文SCS具有良好的信度和效度,但需要对个别条目做具体修订。
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of SCS. Methods: Sixty-two college students were tested with self-rating scale, dementia scale and students’ daily life and learning stress scale. Results: The Chinese version of SCS consisted of two factors, and each dimension had an item load between 0.518 and 0.743, accounting for 52.1% of the total variance. The internal consistency coefficients for each dimension were 0.77 and 0.73, respectively, and the test-retest reliability of the total and two subscales after one month was 0.84, 0.79 and 0.83, respectively. Chinese SCS two points two tables and depression and stress score between -0.32 ~ 0.53. Conclusion: Chinese SCS has a good reliability and validity, but need to make specific amendments to individual entries.