在司法过程中,法官对案件事实的确认都是在证据和证明的基础上对过往事件的重构,法官并不能回到事件自身。和文学作品相比,法官对于案件事实的解释和重构受到多重因素的制约。法官对案件事实的阐释是一种建设性的解释,同时受制于法官共同体的形式理性和社会期待的约束。 In the judicial process, the judge’s confirmation of the facts of the case is the reconstruction of the past events on the basis of evidence and evidence, and the judge can not return to the incident itself. Compared with literary works, judges’ interpretation and reconstruction of the facts of the case are subject to many factors. Judges’ interpretations of the facts of the case are constructive explanations, subject to both the formal rationality of judges community and the expectation of society.