论文部分内容阅读
从学风不变、话语系统转换、史观派与史料派地位的浮沉诸角度看,近50年来的中国历史学大体上可区分为两个段落,这就是前40年和后10年。前40年间的历史学,可以看作是马克思主义历史话语从占据主流地位到这个“主流地位受到了一定的削弱”的过程;而初步进入一个以国学复兴重光为基本背景的多元离散的时期,则可能是近十几年来历史学的整体趋向。半个世纪以来的史学史表明:唯物史观派和史料考订派在宏观与微观两个方面同时构成了当代史学发展的两种动力,厚此薄彼或厚彼薄此均不可取。作为既努力兼取两派所长又努力扬弃两派所短的第三支力量,以社会经济史研究者为代表的会通派的出现,则可能意味着从传统史学向现代史学长达一个世纪转型过程的终结。
From the perspectives of the style of study, the transformation of discourse system and the ups and downs of the history of the school of thought and the position of the historical figures, Chinese history in the past 50 years can be roughly divided into two paragraphs, that is, the first 40 years and the later 10 years. The history of the first 40 years can be regarded as the process of the historical discourse of Marxism from the mainstream status to the “mainstream status weakened by a certain amount.” However, it has initially entered a pluralistic and discrete Period, it may be the past ten years the overall trend of history. The history of history in the past half century shows that the historical materialism and the historical materialism both constitute the two impetuses of the development of contemporary history both in macro and micro aspects. As the third force trying hard to win both factions and working hard to abandon the shortest by the two factions, the emergence of a congressional faction represented by a researcher of socio-economic history may mean that from the traditional historiography up to one in modern history The end of the century transformation process.