论文部分内容阅读
在第26届奥运会期间,笔者以中国首任国际奥委会体育仲裁法院仲裁员的身分赴亚特兰大执行任务,参加了该体育仲裁法院亚特兰大特别仲裁庭的全部相关工作,接触了一些资料和文件,并在昂德拉德诉佛得角国家奥委会(Andrade Vs.Cape Verde Noc)一案中担任仲裁员,从而对国际体育仲裁这一比较新的法律制度有了一个基本的了解。 一、国际体育仲裁的概念 与国际政治仲裁和国际商事仲裁相比,国际体育仲裁具有以下特点:(1)仲裁的主体是自然人(运动员、教练员、体育官员等)、法人(国际奥委会、国家奥委会、体育联合会、体育协会、体育俱乐部、体育新闻机构等)和承办国际体育赛事(如奥运会、亚运会、世界锦标赛等)的城市政府;(2)仲裁的对象是与国际体育活动有关的
During the period of the 26th Olympic Games, the author went to Atlanta as the arbitrator of China’s first IOC Sports Arbitration Court and took part in all the relevant work of the Special Arbitration Tribunal of Atlanta Sports Court, contacted with some materials and documents, And acted as arbitrator in Andrade Vs. Cape Verde Noc, giving a basic understanding of the relatively new legal system of international sports arbitration. First, the concept of international sports arbitration Compared with international political arbitration and international commercial arbitration, international sports arbitration has the following characteristics: (1) The main arbitration is natural persons (athletes, coaches, sports officials, etc.), legal persons (International Olympic Committee , National Olympic committees, sports federations, sports associations, sports clubs, sports news agencies, etc.) and city governments that host international sports events (such as Olympic Games, Asian Games, World Championships, etc.); (2) Sports related