论文部分内容阅读
本案涉及民间文学艺术衍生作品著作权侵权判定及惠益分享问题,在我国有关法律尚未完善的情况下,二审法院紧扣现行立法的一般规定和著作权侵权判定的基本原理,结合此类纠纷的特殊性,做出了新的诠释和发展,明确了侵权判定方法和步骤,对侵权问题做出正确的认定,并就惠益分享问题作出了判决——创造性地运用民法通则第四条有关公平原则的规定,既保护利用民间文学艺术而成的衍生作品的著作权,也鼓励对民间文学艺术的保存和传承。
This case involves the determination of copyright infringement and benefit-sharing issues of derivative works of folklore. In the absence of relevant laws in our country, the courts of second instance hold close the general provisions of the existing legislation and the basic principles of the determination of copyright infringement. Combining the particularities of such disputes , Made new interpretations and developments, clarified the methods and steps for the determination of infringement, correctly established the issues of infringement, and made judgments on the issue of benefit-sharing - The creative use of Article 4 of the General Principles of Civil Law on the principle of fairness Stipulates that it not only protects the copyrights of derivative works that make use of folklore, but also encourages the preservation and inheritance of folklore.