论文部分内容阅读
本文比较鼻腔持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和鼻腔给氧治疗轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的疗效.受试者为8例轻度OSA 患者,均为男性,平均年龄57±4.8岁;病例选择标准为呼吸暂停+呼吸不全指数(AHI)须≥5,且至少伴有下列情况之一者:①日间过度嗜睡,多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)显示平均睡眠潜伏期≤10分钟;②高血压,收缩压>150mmHg 和(或)舒张压≥95mmHg;③重度心律失常。实验方法为:第1个月8例患者于夜间随机接受鼻腔给氧或压缩空气(4L/min)治疗;第3个月所有患者均应用鼻腔CPAP,其压力为2.5～
This article compares the efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and nasal oxygenation in patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The subjects were all 8 men with mild OSA and had an average age of 57 ± 4.8 years old; case selection criteria for apnea + respiratory insufficiency index (AHI) to be ≥ 5, and at least one of the following conditions: ① excessive daytime sleepiness, multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) showed an average sleep latency ≤ 10 Minute; ②hypertension, systolic blood pressure> 150mmHg and (or) diastolic blood pressure≥95mmHg; ③ severe arrhythmia. The experimental method was as follows: 8 patients were randomized to receive nasal oxygen or compressed air (4L / min) at night during the first month. Nasal CPAP was applied to all patients in the third month, with a pressure of 2.5 ~