论文部分内容阅读
自1995年12月提起诉讼至2009年4月最高人民法院作出再审判决,期间经过两级检察院抗诉、当事人申诉、四级人民法院审判,历时十四年,“蝌蚪案”原告终于获得水污染所致养殖蝌蚪的损害赔偿。此案成为环境法学界关注的典型案例。早在最高人民法院终审判决之前,该案就先后被武汉大学、中国政法大学和中国人民大学等国内知名环境法学教授收录到案例指导教材中,最高人民法院审判监督庭编写的《审判监督指导与研究》也刊登了由杨兴明法官撰写的关于评析本案的论文。环境法学者与本案前三份判决及杨兴明法官的观点冲突与分歧,虽然可以止于最高人民
Since December 1995 to the Supreme People’s Court in April 2009 to make a retrial verdict, during which two levels of prosecution protest, the parties petition, four people’s court trial, which lasted fourteen years, “tadpole case ” the plaintiff finally got the water Pollution caused by farming tadpoles damage compensation. The case has become a typical case of environmental law scholars. As early as the final judgment of the Supreme People’s Court, the case was successively enrolled in the case teaching materials by well-known environmental law professors such as Wuhan University, China University of Political Science and Law and Renmin University of China. The Trial Supervision Guide of the Supreme People’s Court and the Court of Trial Supervision Research "also published a thesis written by Judge Yang Xingming on the evaluation of this case. Environmental law scholars and the first three judgments in this case and the views of Judge Yang Xingming conflict and differences, although it can stop at the highest people