在我国司法改革进程中,量刑制度改革意义重大.最高人民法院试行两个《指导意见》,有助于推进量刑规范化,但其理论基础、权力(权利)配置和程序整合、针对性和可操作性以及实际效果反馈都面临一系列难题.为有效应对这些难题,应当采取一些积极措施。量刑建议制度作为检察机关公诉活动改革的一部分,受到理论界和实务界的广泛关注.由于我国法律没有明确规定检察机关的量刑建议权,因此为了维护检察机关公诉活动的严肃性,保证出庭公诉质量,制定统一的量刑建议具体实施规范十分必要.据两高《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》的规定,在涉及商标犯罪的案件中,建议依据商标知名度本身的特点,以及刑法的最新发展理念,将知名度因素作为“法定量刑情节”予以考量.同时,在考量过程中,要对驰名商标是否认定、知名度认定细节等问题予以注意.实现量刑公平是量刑机制改革的目的,而量刑公平的判断则是量刑是否符合社会大众对犯罪应受刑罚的预期.改革我国的量刑机制应采用“量化与对话”的综合性的改革方案。传统人伦量刑观将儒家德礼、伦常等核心价值观运用到刑罚裁量中,彰显出刑法的人伦精神和价值,在我国法制史的长河中呈现出强大的生命力。继承和发扬传统人伦量刑观的合理因素,完善当代量刑机制,是传统法律文化和时代法治精神的共同要求和必然选择.《美国量刑指南》是值得借鉴的域外重要经验,717号修正案是该《指南》近期作出的重要修改,进一步论证了《指南》存在的必要性和合理性,以美国最高法院的系列案例,揭示《指南》适用过程中的两大主旨,对我国如何以量刑指导文件推进量刑规范化具有重要的启示意义. In the process of judicial reform in our country, the reform of the sentencing system is of great significance.The Supreme People’s Court tried two “Guiding Opinions” to promote the standardization of sentencing, but its theoretical basis, power (rights) allocation and procedural integration, pertinence and operation As well as the feedback on the actual results, all face a series of difficult problems.In order to effectively deal with these problems, some positive measures should be taken. As part of the reform of procuratorial activities in public prosecution, the system of sentencing is widely concerned by theorists and practitioners.As China’s law does not clearly stipulate the procuratorial power of sentencing, in order to maintain the seriousness of procuratorial activities and ensure the quality of public prosecution It is very necessary to formulate specific norms of implementation of sentencing recommendations.According to the provisions of “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights” in Lianggao and Gao, in the cases involving trademark crimes, it is suggested that according to the characteristics of the trademark reputation itself, As well as the latest development of criminal law concept, the visibility factor as “legal penalty sentence ” to be considered at the same time, in the process of consideration, we should pay attention to whether the well-known trademark is recognized, the recognition of the details of the details etc .. To achieve sentencing fairness is sentencing mechanism reform The purpose of sentencing justice is to determine whether the sentencing is in line with the expectations of the general public on the crime should be punished.We should adopt a comprehensive reform program of “quantification and dialogue” to reform China’s sentencing mechanism. The traditional ethical outlook on sentencing applied the core values ​​of Confucian morality and ethics to the discretion of punishment, which shows the human spirit and value of the criminal law and shows great vitality in the long history of our legal history. To inherit and carry forward the rational factors of the traditional concept of human beings’ sentencing and punishment and to perfect the mechanism of sentencing in contemporary China are the common and inevitable choices of the traditional legal culture and the spirit of the rule of law in the era. “American Sentencing Guidelines” is an important extraterritorial experience worthy of reference. Amendment No. 717 The important amendments recently made by the Guide further demonstrate the necessity and rationality of the Guide. Based on a series of cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, it reveals the two major purposes of applying the Guide, Promote the standardization of sentencing has important implications.