论文部分内容阅读
深圳某厂女工程女士脑死亡后家属仍坚持治疗但终告不治,要求认定工伤,但因超过48小时法定抢救时限遭人社部门拒绝,双方最后对簿公堂,家属败诉。其实,这起工伤纠纷的分歧点主要在于双方认知上的偏差,也就是在最终死亡时间的认定上存在异议。若要获得工伤认定,则势必要舍弃亲情与道义、责任与良知,掐着时间抢救;若看重感情,则意味着放弃工伤认定后的一切经济赔偿,更要承担“人财两空”的风险。
However, after more than 48 hours ’legal rescue time limit was rejected by the social administration, both parties finally lost courtrooms and relatives’ court cases. In fact, the main point of this dispute over work-related injuries lies in the cognitive bias between the two parties, that is, there is disagreement on the determination of the final death time. To obtain the identification of work-related injuries, it is bound to abandon the family and morality, morality, responsibility and conscience, pinch the time to rescue; if the value of feelings, it means to give up all the financial compensation for work-related injuries, but also to assume risks of.