论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,我国高等教育由于深受理工科办学理念的影响和制约,理工模式几乎成了一切院校的办学标准,尤其在教学、科研的评价机制方面尤为突出,所有的评价科目均以量化的数据为准。这种定于一尊的做法虽然有一定的效力,但也使许多专业性的院校在评价中失去了固有的特色和活力。就以科研成果统计为例,现行的方法是只认定著作、论文和实验报告等文字性材料,而高等艺术教育中极为重要的艺术创作成果则往往被排除在外,至少在评价指标中很少被顾及,而在实践中我们又缺少独立的艺术创作成果的评
For a long time, due to the influence and restriction of higher education in science and engineering in our country, the pattern of science and technology has almost become the standard of running schools in all colleges and universities, especially in the evaluation mechanism of teaching and scientific research. All the evaluation subjects are quantified The data shall prevail. Although this one-sided approach has some effectiveness, it has also caused many specialized institutions to lose their inherent characteristics and vitality in the evaluation. Take the statistics of scientific research as an example. The current method is to identify only written materials such as writings, essays and experimental reports, while the most important artistic creation in higher education is often excluded. At least, few of the indicators of evaluation Taking into account, and in practice we lack the independent evaluation of the results of artistic creation