论文部分内容阅读
在中国科学院的历史上,很多研究所的发展变化与领导班子有着极其紧密的关系,存在着“成也所长,败也所长”的现象。这一方面说明领导班子特别是所长对研究所的重要性,但另一方面也说明了一个不很正常的问题,就是研究所的发展主要取决于领导者个人的魅力,而缺乏体制和机制的保证。如何保证研究所健康、持续、稳定地发展,这是许多研究所一直在思考的问题。自动化所在1998年提出了“按照大多数科学家的共同意愿办所”的命题,在创新文化建设中,则把推进民主管理,建立可持续发展机制作为一项核心工作对待,找到了一个很好的答案。
In the history of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the development and changes of many research institutes have an extremely close relationship with the leading bodies and there exists the phenomenon of “becoming a director, losing the director”. On the one hand, it shows the importance of the leadership, especially the director, to the Institute, but on the other hand, it also shows that the development of the Institute mainly depends on the personal charisma of the leader and the lack of institutions and mechanisms The guarantee. How to ensure a healthy, sustained and stable development of the institute is a problem which many institutes are constantly thinking about. The place where automation was put forward In 1998, proposing “according to the common aspiration of most scientists” proposition, in the construction of innovative culture, we put democracy promotion and the establishment of a mechanism for sustainable development as a core task and found a very important Good answer