“]避风港”原则明确了网络服务提供者的担责规则,有效实现了著作权人、网络服务提供者和社会公众利益之间的平衡。我国在《信息网络传播权保护条例》中也对其进行了吸收、采用。然而,由于规范的笼统、模糊,不同主体对其的理解不同,这样就造成“避风港”原则在适用上产生了较大的争议。本文从实体及程序方面对“避风港”原则进行分析,以明确其适用问题。 “] Safe Harbor ” principle clearly defined the rules of charge of network service providers and effectively realized the balance between the interests of copyright owners, network service providers and the public. Our country has also absorbed and adopted it in the “Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Propagate Network Information.” However, due to the generalization and vagueness of the norms, different subjects have different understandings on them, thus resulting in a more controversial application of the “safe haven” principle. This article analyzes the principles of “Safe Harbor ” in terms of entities and procedures to clarify its application.