论文部分内容阅读
目的比较喜炎平与痰热清两种药物治疗手足口病的临床疗效。方法选取于我院就诊确诊为手足口病的患儿78例,按就诊先后顺序分为喜炎平组和痰热清组,观察比较两组患者的退热时间、手足皮疹消退时间、口腔溃疡消退时间、临床总体有效率。结果喜炎平组患儿的退热时间、手足皮疹及口腔溃疡的消退时间均短于痰热清组P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义,喜炎平组的总体有效率高于痰热清组P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论喜炎平治疗患儿手足口病的疗效优于痰热清,并能够快速减轻症状。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of Xiyanping and Tanreqing in treating HFMD. Methods 78 cases diagnosed as hand, foot and mouth disease in our hospital were divided into Xiyanping group and Tanreqing group according to the order of their treatment. The antipyretic time, the regression time of hand-foot-skin rash, oral ulcer Subsided time, clinical overall efficiency. Results The antipyretic time, hand-foot rash and oral ulcer remission in Xiyanping group were shorter than that in Tanreqing group (P <0.05), the difference was statistically significant, the overall effective rate of Xiyanping group was higher than that of Tanreqing Group P <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Xiyanping treatment of hand, foot and mouth disease in children is better than the effect of Tanreqing, and can quickly reduce the symptoms.