常有教师这么抱怨:我们花了大量的时间去对学生的作文精批细改,结果有几个学生会领我们的情呢?我们所做的只不过是一项重复而无效的劳动。然而,站在学生的角度看,当教师的评语成为“全国河山一片红”时,还有什么地方需要学生花时间去看、去改正呢?传统的习作评语都使用笼统、概括、千篇一律的语言,遏制了学生习作的兴 Often, teachers complain that we spend a lot of time fine-tuning students’ essays. As a result, how many students will lead us? All we do is repeat and invalid work. However, from a student’s point of view, when teachers’ comments become “a river of red across the country,” where else do students need time to look at and correct them? Conventional work reviews are generalized, generalized and stereotyped The language, to curb the hing of student work